Google Chrome’s Real Target

Posted on

  • email
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • share this

share this



By Vincent Vizzaccaro, Net Applications

Google has entered the browser wars with Chrome, its concept of an open-source browser. And it’s no lightweight.

At first glance, it’s easy to think that Chrome is targeting Microsoft’s Internet Explorer, Mozilla’s Firefox, Apple’s Safari and Opera. But, if you probe into Google’s own story behind Chrome, they seem to be positioning it to transform the very way we use a computer. And, the real target is the very core of Microsoft – Windows and Office. Let’s take a look at typical computer usage today, and Google’s vision for the future.

Current Typical Computer Usage - You Likely:

• Use a PC running a version of Windows or an Apple running Mac OS.
• Use Microsoft Office, Microsoft Works, Apple iWork or Sun StarOffice for word processing, spreadsheets and presentations.
• Use Microsoft Outlook for email and calendaring.
• Browse the Internet using IE, Firefox, Safari or Opera.
• Run applications from software developers who typically use Microsoft Visual Studio for development of both off-line and online applications.
• Are connected to the Internet some of the time, while some are connected to the Internet all of the time.

Computing with Google’s Chrome – You Will Likely:

• Be able to run Chrome from any platform, but can get a free version of Linux on a low-cost PC to run it.
• Use free Google Docs for word processing, spreadsheets and presentations.
• Use free Gmail for email and free Google Calendar for calendaring.
• Browse the Internet and access everything else from free Google Chrome.
• Run applications within Chrome built with JavaScript.
• Want to be connected to the Internet all of the time to maximize the Google experience.

This is a direct and potent threat to Microsoft’s operating systems, business applications, browsers, email, calendaring and development tools. So, what should Microsoft do to thwart the attack?

I see these potential problems with Google’s approach:

1. People are slow to change. Getting people to change the very way they do computing will be no small task. That includes browsing, email, word processing and more. However, Google has an advantage by providing their services for free.* It seems they are only concerned with
generating additional ad revenue with their other ventures.

2. This is new territory for Google. Google doesn’t have many applications or services that have been time tested. Even Gmail is still labeled ‘beta.’ Microsoft has a wealth of experience in most everything they do. We may not like the process, but Microsoft’s massive user base provides ample testing opportunities. People have grown to trust Microsoft’s reliability in almost everything except early operating
system releases.

3. Privacy concerns. Many people are wary to give Google any of their business or personal data for the very reason they seem only concerned with generating additional ad revenue – through the plethora of data collection.

4. Security concerns. By using an older version of WebKit for development, Chrome has several reported security flaws that leave users open to intrusion. Google has nowhere near the experience of Microsoft, Mozilla, Apple or Opera in dealing with security issues. Users will want to know these concerns have been addressed before making Chrome their primary browser, or even having it run on their computer.

5. Full-time Internet access for the masses. Google is attempting to lessen this concern with Google Gears, but many of the services they provide require Internet access. When we reach a level of complete Internet penetration, this problem will go away. But for now, there are large segments of the population without access. To help this process along, Google has taken to rather extraordinary measures. The FCC
recently auctioned the US 700 MHz wireless spectrum. With the strategic need to have people connected to the Internet full-time, Google actively participated in the auction, working to ensure that part of the spectrum was dedicated to open access from any wireless device. Because the 700 MHz spectrum has a long range and is able to penetrate walls easily, it has been considered by many to be the key to providing nationwide Internet access. Google has announced they were not the winning bid for any of the spectrum, and it’s likely that AT&T and Verizon will control most of it. But, they did win an open access concession on part of the spectrum.

Where does Microsoft stand?
Microsoft is in an enviable position of dominant leadership in operating systems, browsers, development tools, and office applications. They are also strong in enterprise applications, server operating systems and database management. But, Google owns the dominant search engine market share position, as well as online advertising and several of the most visited websites on the Internet.

If I were a Microsoft strategist, I would consider:

1. No strategic changes at all. Microsoft tried to buy Yahoo to bolster the only areas in which they trail Google – search market share, online ad revenue and traffic on multiple Web properties. In hindsight, the failed bid may have been a blessing in disguise, as the recent financial crisis is deeply affecting Internet traffic and online ad revenue. As stated previously, Google faces significant challenges in Microsoft’s market. It may well be that Microsoft can change nothing, and continue to maintain market leadership in the areas they currently possess.

2. Embrace the Cloud. Many of us use multiple devices (work computer, home computer, handheld devices, etc.) and we’re tired of having disparate systems and data. The browser with our favorite bookmarks provides a sense of familiar access from multiple devices. With so many of us living in our browsers more often than our operating systems, cloud computing becomes all the more attractive.

3. Get the Justice Department involved. Microsoft has been the target of the Justice Department for years, and must have some very high ranking contacts there. Google would have us believe that privacy is overrated. The company’s mission statement is to organize all the world’s information, and make it universally accessible and useful. Their approach is at the very least open to scrutiny from Justice. And, Google and Yahoo have struck a deal to have Google provide ads for Yahoo Search now pending government review. With this deal, Google will control advertising for 90.91% of all searches. Microsoft, along with many others, is already claiming Google has a virtual monopoly in search.




So, how has Google Chrome affected browser market share since its launch?

Net Applications Global Internet Usage Market Share is tracking Google Chrome by the day, as can be seen at http://marketshare.hitslink.com.

While Chrome got off to an impressive start – 1.48 percent usage market share within the first 24 hours of its launch – the early adopters are fading.

Usage share has been dropping since the third day after its launch, but has recently stabilized at approximately 0.7 percent to 0.8 percent market share. Initially, Chrome claimed its market share came at the expense of Internet Explorer. However, as of last week, Chrome’s share was coming fairly evenly from all the other major browsers except for Safari. But, since Chrome doesn’t yet work on Mac OS that may be the reason why Safari is currently immune.

Here is the total browser usage market share picture for September 2008:



We have to keep in mind that Google hasn’t aggressively marketed Chrome yet. The only effort I’ve seen from Google is in sponsored links on search results for ‘browser’ or ‘browsers’ search terms. On Google search, Chrome is naturally the top sponsored link. On Yahoo, it was second. And on Microsoft Live Search, I couldn’t even find it in the first 5 pages of organic results. Safari, Firefox, Opera and even Netscape (although that link was broken) all showed up on the first page of search results from Live for ‘browser.’

Microsoft has been the target of Apple as well. Apple’s “I’m a Mac, and I’m a PC” ad campaign has won rave reviews. And, it has arguably been a key component to Apple’s gains in market share. Microsoft took a while, but is fighting back with proud “I’m a PC” counterattacks. That’s a more conventional market share battle, and conventional marketing strategies likely apply. The battle with Google is anything but conventional though, and requires far more creative strategies and tactics.

So, while it’s too early to see any long term impact from Chrome, there’s little doubt about the real target. How long will it take, and by what means will Microsoft respond? Time will tell, and we’ll be tracking the results.

About the Author: Vincent Vizzaccaro is EVP of Marketing and Strategic Alliances for Net Applications, a leader in Website Analytics and Internet Metrics. He can be reached at vince@netapplications.com

:: Create a local presence wherever you want to do business. Get a local phone number. ::


Login To Comment


Become a Member

Not already a part of our community? Sign up to participate in the discussion. It's free and quick.

Sign Up

2 comments

Rob 11-25-2008 9:39 AM

This is the first article I've read on Web Site Magazine so is my first impression. It's a mixed bag so far.

I think your analysis of Google's intention for Chrome is spot on. At least it matches what everybody else is saying about it.

The section on problems with Google's approach was interesting.

"Google and Yahoo have struck a deal to have Google provide ads for Yahoo Search". Yes but Google has withdrawn the offer. So you're info seems a bit out of date by about a month.

"3. Get the Justice Department involved." So you recommend that Microsoft, the holder of the world monopoly on computer operating systems, should try to use the Justice Department to stifle its competition. I guess all business of this size will use our government to further their own ends whenever they can but I was startled to see it in print. Do you recommend bribery too?

Microsoft has proven to be run by people that will go to almost any lengths to stifle the competition. As a software developer I've had to deal with the consequences of Microsoft's machinations to make sure competing applications failed to work on the next version of an OS. (Remember the mantra, "Windows isn't dun until Lotus won't run!") So as both a developer and user of software, I avoid Microsoft products whenever I can. I have totally abandoned MS Office in favor of OpenOffice, for example.

So far Google hasn't done anything evil that I know of so I favor their products when I can. They have gained their market share the old fashion way ... they earned it.

Based on history I'd prefer a Google monopoly over a Microsoft monopoly.

All in all a thought provoking article.

Peace,

Rob:-]

Vasiliy Zelenko 12-15-2008 3:31 PM

the only reason Firefox is not the leader, is because IE comes preinstalled on windows machines.  other than that, Firefox is much more superior than IE.

Add to the discussion!

999 E Touhy Ave
Des Plaines, IL 60018

Toll Free: 1.800.817.1518
International: 1.773.628.2779
Fax: 1.773.272.0920
Email: info@websitemagazine.com

Facebook


Twitter