<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>'Net Features : 91509</title><link>http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/91509/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: 91509</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP2 (Build: 31104.93)</generator><item><title>Video Optimziation: Google Supports FB Share and RDFa</title><link>http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/2009/09/15/video-optimziation-google-supports-fb-share-and-rdfa.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1e469e21-c924-44fa-a132-47b5d0a8ad47:10183</guid><dc:creator>Pete Prestipino</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10183</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/2009/09/15/video-optimziation-google-supports-fb-share-and-rdfa.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;If you&amp;#39;re creating videos, hosting them on your website, and
aim to optimize those videos for competitive search engine placement you&amp;#39;ll want
to pay attention to this one. &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Google today announced support for Facebook Share and Yahoo! SearchMonkey
RDFa for videos. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These markup formats (micro-formats) allow you to specify
information (like titles, descriptions and even preview images) about videos and
potentially influence how they are indexed - although it&amp;#39;s doubtful that videos
utilizing this technique will be given preferential treatment. While Google does
pretty well at discovering this information by itself as it stands today, using these
format structures enables you to give them some help and guidance. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has advised that to maximize the chances they find the right markup on
your video pages, you should check to ensure it appears in the HTML without the
execution of JavaScript or Flash. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following is some example code provided by Google on how to use both
Facebook Share and the SearchMonkey RDFa for videos:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Facebook Share:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.websitemagazine.com/images/blog/facebooksharevideocode.gif" border="0" height="125" width="530" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;RDFa (Yahoo! SearchMonkey):&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:15;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.websitemagazine.com/images/blog/yahoosearchmonkey-rdfa-vide.gif" border="0" height="351" width="530" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10183" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/google/default.aspx">google</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/video/default.aspx">video</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/yahoo/default.aspx">yahoo</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/91509/default.aspx">91509</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/RDFa/default.aspx">RDFa</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/video+optimization/default.aspx">video optimization</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/searchmonkey/default.aspx">searchmonkey</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/Facebook+Share/default.aspx">Facebook Share</category></item><item><title>What's New With Noah (Classifieds)?</title><link>http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/2009/09/15/what-s-new-with-noah-classifieds.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1e469e21-c924-44fa-a132-47b5d0a8ad47:10172</guid><dc:creator>Pete Prestipino</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10172</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/2009/09/15/what-s-new-with-noah-classifieds.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;I&amp;#39;ve always had a special place in my virtual heart for classifieds. Perhaps it&amp;#39;s my frugal nature or how with a caring
and careful eye they often reveal many interesting insights into the state of the Web and
the world in general. &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As the U.S. struggled out of the dire straits it entered
starting last September (today is actually the anniversary of the Lehman
Brothers collapse), Website Magazine published an article on how to &amp;quot;&lt;a href="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/2009/04/09/roll-your-own-craigslist.aspx"&gt;Roll Your Own
Craigslist&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; - a profile of three exceptional classified software solutions that would enable anyone to start their own targeted classified website.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I had the opportunity to speak with Steve Taylor this week, developer/owner/founder
of &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://noahsclassifieds.org"&gt; Noah&amp;#39;s Classifieds&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; and one of
the software solutions mentioned, about the latest version (4.1.1) of Noah&amp;#39;s Classifieds. Some interesting features were added
recently but in my opinion they pale in comparison to what&amp;#39;s coming up in the
future for Noah&amp;#39;s Classifieds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New additions include a WYSIWYG editor (which can be assigned to the admin and the end user), ReCAPTCHA, a PCI-compliant shopping cart in
&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cartmanager.net"&gt;CartManager&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;, and &amp;quot;Send to a friend&amp;quot; capabilities. Taylor also mentioned that Noah&amp;#39;s is also more SEO friendly as
the titles influence the permalink structure.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Noah&amp;#39;s Classifieds has always been on my list of solutions to to watch but its&amp;#39;
future enhancement are what will forever separate it from its competitors.
Upcoming enhancements include adding Facebook Connect and Google Friend Connect and the ability to import classified listings from
Oodle through their API. Users will also be able to add new listings from their Noah&amp;#39;s installation directly to Oodle - call it &amp;quot;distributed classifieds&amp;quot; if you
will. Big things are coming for Noah&amp;#39;s and for the $199 perpetual license it&amp;#39;s
certainly worth considering.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10172" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/Software/default.aspx">Software</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/classifieds/default.aspx">classifieds</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/noahs+classifieds/default.aspx">noahs classifieds</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/91509/default.aspx">91509</category></item><item><title>Mobile vs Non-Mobile Ad CTR</title><link>http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/2009/09/15/mobile-vs-non-mobile-ad-ctr.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1e469e21-c924-44fa-a132-47b5d0a8ad47:10169</guid><dc:creator>Pete Prestipino</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10169</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/2009/09/15/mobile-vs-non-mobile-ad-ctr.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Online advertising network Chitika released a rather telling &lt;a href="http://chitika.com/research/2009/iphone-mobile-users-worst-ad-targets/"&gt;study of mobile vs. non-mobile Internet usage&lt;/a&gt; this week. If you&amp;#39;ve bought into the potential of the mobile market, you might want to reconsider that position. The study suggests that mobile users are approximately half as likely to click on an advertisement as non-mobile users. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the announcement, &amp;quot;&lt;i&gt;Of the 92 million impressions cited in the study, approximately 1.3 million (1.5%) came from mobile browsing. While non-mobile held steady with a 0.83% clickthrough rate, mobile as a whole pulled a mere 0.48% &amp;ndash; just over half of the average.&lt;/i&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While growth in smartphones might indicate a strong market potential for mobile advertising, users are apparently not receptive to it (or too savvy to click on the ads) perhaps because of the immediacy (find answers quickly) that mobile provides. What I also find interesting is that iPhone users (those with the best UI) have the lowest click-through rates - just 0.30%. This might suggest, especially in light of the fact that Palm (and those from the &amp;quot;other&amp;quot; category) has an atrocious UI and is difficult to navigate around indicating some invalid clicks on some level as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.websitemagazine.com/images/blog/chitikamobileads.gif" style="margin:5px;" height="250" width="254" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10169" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/mobile/default.aspx">mobile</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/mobile+advertising/default.aspx">mobile advertising</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/mobile+ads/default.aspx">mobile ads</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/chitika/default.aspx">chitika</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/91509/default.aspx">91509</category></item><item><title>Bing The Fastest Growing Search Engine, Yahoo Stumbling, Google Steady</title><link>http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/2009/09/15/bing-the-fastest-growing-search-engine-yahoo-stumbling-google-steady.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1e469e21-c924-44fa-a132-47b5d0a8ad47:10170</guid><dc:creator>Pete Prestipino</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=10170</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/2009/09/15/bing-the-fastest-growing-search-engine-yahoo-stumbling-google-steady.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;While Google remains far and away the leading search engine (with a 65% share of searches), Bing, at least according to Nielsen, is the fastest growing search engine. &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bing&amp;#39;s search market share in August rose 22.1% to 10.7% of all searches up from 9.0% in July. It is important to note also that these numbers don&amp;#39;t reflect Bing traffic alone, but rather MSN, Live and Bing combined. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So if Google (2.6%), AOL (1.8%), ASK (2.9%) and even Local.com experienced month-over-month search growth, was there an engine that didn&amp;#39;t fare as well? You bet - Yahoo! - whose traffic in August fell 4.2%. Proceed to make assumptions on the reason(s) why, but it might have been caused by the full-scale introduction of Bing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.websitemagazine.com/images/blog/searchaugust09nielsen.gif" style="border:1px solid black;margin:5px;" height="312" width="571" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10170" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/google/default.aspx">google</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/yahoo/default.aspx">yahoo</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/search+engines/default.aspx">search engines</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/nielsen+online/default.aspx">nielsen online</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/bing/default.aspx">bing</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/91509/default.aspx">91509</category></item></channel></rss>