<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>'Net Features : google knol</title><link>http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/google+knol/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: google knol</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP2 (Build: 31104.93)</generator><item><title>Wikipedia: For Whom the Knol Tolls</title><link>http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/2008/07/24/google-knol-released.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1e469e21-c924-44fa-a132-47b5d0a8ad47:5848</guid><dc:creator>Pete Prestipino</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=5848</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/2008/07/24/google-knol-released.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://knol.google.com/"&gt;Google Knol&lt;/a&gt; has been publicly 
released today, perhaps signaling the end for competitor Wikipedia.&lt;/b&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The difference between the two services is that unlike Wikipedia, KNOLs (a 
unit of knowledge) are not written collaboratively. Instead, one user creates 
and moderates (and of course profits) from the KNOL. A little background might 
be helpful here. A knol is &amp;quot;&lt;i&gt;an authoritative article about a specific topic&lt;/i&gt;&amp;quot; 
according to the site. What makes individual KNOLs a real game changer however 
is not their ease of use, or that they offer the creator of the KNOL greater 
control or an area to connect with other experts. Oh, no - that&amp;#39;s just the icing 
on the cake. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What really makes Knol a powerful tool is &lt;b&gt;visibility&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According the site, Google values and promotes authorship. &amp;quot;Great content 
will be visible on any search engine.&amp;quot; If you are Wikipedia, that presents a 
major problem. Here&amp;#39;s why. Wikipedia has secured top spots on some of the most 
competitive search terms on the Web (and don&amp;#39;t think for one minute that Google 
is not completely aware of that fact). Conduct a query on a general topic and 
you can be sure that one of the top listings will be a Wikipedia entry. 
Introduce Knol and Wikipedia entries (regardless if Google intends to do no evil 
or not) are sure to move down the list. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Count on the fact that many will cry foul and that it&amp;#39;s not fair to other 
content producers. Google has a responsibility to continually develop more 
traction (and revenue) and that is exactly what KNOL provides. My advice? Go 
create a KNOL. Now. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.websitemagazine.com/images/blog/google-knol2.gif" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5848" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/google+knol/default.aspx">google knol</category><category domain="http://www.websitemagazine.com/content/blogs/posts/archive/tags/wikipedia/default.aspx">wikipedia</category></item></channel></rss>