5 Reasons the New-Look Facebook Could Sink Twitter

Posted on

  • email
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • share this

share this

advertisement

Facebook is launching a new look, and the main focus is on real-time feeds and status updates on every user's home page - including businesses. Sound familiar? It should, because that's been the very model of success for Twitter. Only now Twitter finds itself with a not-so unique model that absolutely pales in comparison to the capabilities of Facebook. Now that Facebook has the same functionalities as Twitter - and much more - micro-blogging looks to become a part of a larger experience and loses some luster as a stand-alone activity. Here's five reasons you just heard Twitter gulp.

  1. The Network: Facebook has a tried and true network, and it's enormous. The chances of finding a friend or business on Facebook is exponentially higher than finding the same on Twitter (and Facebook's search function is vastly superior.) Those with Facebook profiles but no knowledge of Twitter now have little reason to join Twitter.

  2. Photos and Video: With the new streaming home page, Facebook users can enhance their updates with photos and video, something you can't do on Twitter. How about announcing your status with a video rather than text with abbreviated words? If you want to share something like that on Twitter, you have to upload to a separate service, possibly shrink a URL, then link through a tweet. It's a hassle. And users on the receiving end never know where the click is going to lead.

  3. 140 Characters: The reason Twitter became so popular might be the very reason Facebook wins the war. Using just 140 characters to convey information has advantages, but it's severely limiting ... sometimes you need more. With Facebook, you can now get the same lifestream functions but with the ability to say exactly what you want. Facebook also has a big advantage of instant chat, so you don't have to wade through dozens of "@" responses that are completely out of context to your interests.

  4. Centralization: Facebook's new pages will include filters, allowing you to group your friends and their streams to help avoid clutter. You can do this through Twitter, but only by using third-party apps such as Splitweet. It's just one of dozens of apps that lie outside Twitter's service. And those outside apps carry all kinds of potential for spam and attacks. In fact, a few of these apps are designed to spam people. Facebook is safer and more reliable, and everyone knows it.

  5. Real Friends, Real Value: Twitter is filled with users holding multiple accounts, even squatting on user names. That's not the case on Facebook. You know when you find a friend on Facebook that it's a real person with real interests and intentions. And, those real friends have more real friends, and so on. There's value in "friending" someone on Facebook. They are there to socialize and make real connections. Many Twitter accounts are only there to promote thier own interests and drive website traffic. If you use both websites, take a look at your current updates on both and you'll see a big difference in the level of real communication.

Ultimately, what Facebook is working towards with the social graph and new releases like this is eliminating social fatigue. Instead of belonging to several different networks with specific uses, why not be on one network with all of those functions built in? With Facebook, you can already listen to and share music, subscribe to blogs, play games, email and chat, watch and upload videos - and now you can Twitter.

Filed under: ,

 

Custom WordPress Design Themes at 99designs.com. Get the most designs for your buck when you start a design project!


Login To Comment

forget your login information?

Become a Member

Not already a part of our community? Sign up to participate in the discussion. It’s free and quick.

Sign Up

6 comments

John Kremer 03-06-2009 2:53 AM

I don't think that Facebook will replace the activity that is currently happening on Twitter. As you noted, however, there will certainly be some Facebook users who will now never migrate to Twitter.

The one thing Twitter has going for it that Facebook doesn't have is the incredible number of Twitter websites, applications, and so on that allow for a lot of extra functionality and ease of use. Twitter is far easier to use than Facebook.

kristin rielly 03-06-2009 11:20 AM

I agree with JohnK. I think Facebook has started down the myspace path of over the top, unncessary applications and fluff getting in the way of making real connections. Businesses and organizations really trying to make connections are using twitter because it allows you to get your message across without being harrassed with "pokes" and "drinks", etc.

Although I can't deny the fact that users can hold mulitple twitter accounts, I don't feel the racing need to gain followers and inadequacy when I don't gain, like I do with facebook.

Great article by the way. Thanks for the info!

John AlanR 03-06-2009 3:04 PM

I know that people can use Twitter through mobile devices. Is this possible on Facebook? If not, that's a point of difference.

"Feature bloat" can be a problem. A service that tries to be everything to everyone may not succeed.

jsinkeywest 03-06-2009 4:51 PM

You can use Facebook via the Android anyway Both services are annoying in that their plagued with fake ass gurus hustling stuff that is worthless. One day someone is going to knock on their door and say hey you sold me this LOL

Other then that Facebook has been awesome to catch up with childhood friends and we have a group now so we can have a 30 yr reunion that makes it worth seeing all the other STUFF :)

ConnorS 03-08-2009 11:28 PM

I do not think facebook will replace Twitter but I think that there popularity will die as facebook expands unless they do something big but the still have to much user generated interest

~ Commented through my Website Magazine iPhone App!

RafaelS 03-20-2009 9:05 PM

I think that Twitter is a site with very little to offer but its name created all the hype needed to make it successful. Now it is being compared to sites that were original in what they do but it really is just a copy of only a couple of features of a very successful Facebook, etc...

Bottom line is that comparing Twitter and Facebook (to me at least) is like comparing apples and a space station.

Add to the discussion!

Popular Now at Website Magazine

There are currently no recent posts.

advertisement

999 E Touhy Ave
Des Plaines, IL 60018

Toll Free: 1.800.817.1518
International: 1.773.628.2779
Fax: 1.773.272.0920
Email: info@websitemagazine.com

Facebook


Twitter